Could those of you (if any) who read my site in a news reader provide some feedback on the use of the shortened feed, please. Let me know if a full feed would be preferred. I am still undecided personally.
Thanks.
The Possibility of Slowing Down
1 week ago
6 comments:
My vote is for a full feed. Full feeds are much better than the partial feed that you currently have.
Thank you, Ko. Your comment will be taken into account along with any others I may get. I have to admit, it's kinda nice to be able to read everything in your site reader. On the other hand it's also nice to go to the actual site and see all the pretty graphics, especially that gurgeous picture of moi ;-)
yes, but once i've seen it once, I don't need to see it again. At least not until you change it. Also, i'm not that interested in the site design, I've seen it once and that's enough. I much prefer the standard colours that my reader provides.
I suppose you do also see me in the flesh almost every day, given that we work together. That would be more than enough for most people. Those lovely folk back in the Grand Old UK are lucky(?) if they get to see me once every two years however, so I'd be interested to hear their comments (if any of them are actually reading this).
The half arsed way would be for the partial feed... aligns nicely with our theory on the "gist list"... of course i am the person who couldn't remember if he had 'signed up' for the feed in the first place (i had).
Of course Homer would go the full feed every time :-)
For that matter, if Brent or Praj are reading, they should also do a full text feed...
Post a Comment